Dispatch from Ferguson: Why We Fight

Outrage In Missouri Town After Police Shooting Of 18-Yr-Old Man

Residents and faith and community leaders discuss unrest in Ferguson following the shooting death of Michael Brown during a forum held at Christ the King UCC Church on August 14, 2014. ((Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

By Rachel O’Leary, Amnesty Interntional USA Acting Deputy Executive Director for Membership Mobilization

On August 9, Michael Brown, an unarmed 18-year old, was shot dead by a six-year veteran of the Ferguson police force. The next day, the community organized protests condemning the actions of the police and demanding to know the name of the officer who shot and killed Michael. Those actions continue still, a week later.

The day after the shooting, I sent a text to my colleague at 3:30 AM. It read,  “We need to go to Ferguson.” Later that week, I was on a plane, leading the Amnesty International USA human rights delegation to Ferguson, Missouri.

Our goal: to observe police and protester activity, gather testimony, meet with officials, and offer support to the community. Importantly, our delegation also included organizers who supported local leaders in training community members on methods of nonviolent protest.

On the plane, I read everything I could find about the situation in Ferguson, and spent time reflecting about community, solidarity, and intention. My heart broke as I thought about Michael Brown, the plans he had for his future, the pain his family and community feel at his loss, and the outrage the residents of Ferguson feel after the police harassment and intimidation of a grieving community.

I’ve been a community organizer for over a decade, and heading into the field felt different this time; electric, heavy, as though time had stopped, leapt backwards and forwards at once. The events of the last few days in Ferguson have changed me, changed us.  As a result of what has happened on the ground this week, new community organizing coalitions have formed and Congress has decided to take on the issue of military-style policing, an issue activists have been battling since the 1980s.

However, not everything has been about progress in Ferguson over the last week. On Wednesday and again last night, police tear gassed the crowd amid reports of unrest in the crowds of protestors. Despite this, there is a sense that the ground is slipping from the foundation of militarized law-enforcement and a rising awareness and intolerance of the racial bias that is so pervasive in arrest-related deaths — even if it is two steps forward, one step back. And this is why we fight for human rights and human rights defenders.

We fight because we know that race, class, and identity must no longer determine how people access justice. We fight because we know that when police use excessive force or protesters turn to violence, no one is above the law. We fight because we know that all lives are equal and must be valued equally. We fight together in coalition with each other because we believe in people-powered solutions.

Our struggle isn’t perfect, and Ferguson is no different. Luckily, perfection isn’t the goal. None of us have the solution. Our work is about contribution. And this week, Amnesty International’s contribution is around standing with the community in Ferguson and lifting up the voices of the people who are working on human rights and social justice on the ground.

Our human rights delegation, all 13 of us, are proud and honored to stand with the community organizers, leaders, healers, and elders in Ferguson to demand justice and an end to the pervasive discrimination and violence that people of color face when interacting with police. More than that, we are committed to building a better, stronger movement in solidarity with coalitions and community members on the ground who are working to protect human rights at home– one that endures when the cameras leave and the #Ferguson hashtag stops trending.

Today, I’d like to ask you for your contribution. People powered solutions demand that we get active. Today, there is a family in Ferguson who is mourning the loss of their son.

Take action now to tell Missouri officials to investigate police conduct and avoid unnecessary force.

AIUSA welcomes a lively and courteous discussion that follow our Community Guidelines. Comments are not pre-screened before they post but AIUSA reserves the right to remove any comments violating our guidelines.

3 thoughts on “Dispatch from Ferguson: Why We Fight

  1. Idiotic. Laws are part of the machinery of power, and the status quo of inequality, unequal access to education, unequal housing, unequal access to jobs and opportunities for personal growth, unequal access to resources and rights, is abetted, informed, and maintained by the laws that have been part of the formation of that status quo since the first. What we have is a basic and raw tension that gets obscured by graspers after complexity and neutrality–the people of Ferguson are rightfully angry, noting that they, as a community suffer disproportionate arrests, imprisonment, poverty, crime, police harassment, drug abuse, and all the other inequalities we scientifically know stem from generational poverty and marginalization (and don't for a second forget racism–the American college grads you've met abroad are not representative of the blue-collar whites who become police, who in fact constitute the majority of American whites). Asking for, and enforcing violently, a state of "calm", especially when uttered from the hypocritical lips of "government, by and large, for and by the rich" is demeaning in the extreme to the face of American poverty and segregation. These people have a right to face their oppressors, to stand tall and firm, and to demand their share of what their nation extracts.

  2. Based on your comments on Newsnation, relative to tear gas and excessive force, how do you weed out the people that are causing violent actions while within what's supposed to be a peaceful protest without the use of tear gas to disburse the crowd. I believe the peaceful protests are supposed to be during the day, so in my opinion, while it's unfortunate that women and children get caught in the tear gas, bow would you suggest a violent crowd gets disbursed?