It’s time to ensure that Egyptian human rights violations don’t come labeled “Made in the USA.”
On Oct. 9, the U.S. government announced that the U.S. was suspending millions of dollars in military aid to the Egypt. That was good news, but it’s not enough.
The White House decision fell short of the kind of systematic review necessary to bring public transparency to U.S. arms sales to Egypt and stronger protections against U.S. weapons being used in human rights violations.
On October 8, Amnesty International sent a letter to President Obama calling for three steps to protect Egyptians against the risk of human rights violations involving U.S. arms exports.
The letter made three requests:
- Stop putting lives at risk: The U.S. government should publicly halt the transfer of all small arms, light weapons, related ammunition, equipment and vehicles that bear a substantial risk of being used by Egypt’s security forces to commit human rights violations. These human rights violations include the violent dispersals of crowds and unwarranted lethal force against protesters.
- Make U.S. arms exports public: The U.S. should publicly disclose its arms exports and transfers to Egypt. The arms sales of greatest concern are often of low dollar value and seldom subject to public scrutiny or Congressional reporting requirements. The U.S. public needs to know what weapons its government is sending to Egypt, and why.
- Don’t train violators: The U.S. should prioritize training and assistance arrangements that include rigorous practical exercises and operating standards designed to advance full respect for international human rights law. Egyptian participants – both trainees and trainers – should be vetted to make sure they are not themselves implicated in serious human rights abuses.
Our letter followed several Amnesty International reports finding that Egyptian military and security forces used excessive and lethal force used against Egyptians. Time and time again, Amnesty International found that Egyptian forces targeted and used live ammunition against bystanders and unarmed protesters. Not only that, but Egyptian security forces failed to meet international standards that require that lethal force be used only in situations where lives are in danger.
The White House decision fell short of the kind of systematic review necessary to bring public transparency to U.S. arms sales to Egypt.
In fact, Amnesty International’s documentation makes clear that this was not the only period of human rights violations by security forces. It was part of a pattern of behavior by the Egyptian forces dating back to the Mubarak regime.
Our researchers visited morgues and hospitals and found repeated evidence of gun violence by security forces intended to kill and maim peaceful people. Our own documentation was backed up by video recordings of the incidents.
Despite this undeniable record of misconduct by Egypt’s security forces, the U.S. government still authorized arms exports to Egypt that bore a substantial risk of being used to commit or facilitate serious human rights violations. These arms have included pump-action shotguns, military rifles, machine guns, ammunition, tear gas and other toxic agents. They have also included spare parts for AH-64 Apache attack helicopters used by Egyptian forces in surveillance of the Cairo protest camps, and armored Caterpillar D7R bulldozers to break up those camps.
If U.S. arms sales quietly resume months down the road with no real changes in the behavior and accountability of Egyptian security forces, then an opportunity will have been lost. But if President Obama follows through on Amnesty International’s public call, then his Oct. 9 decision will have been a first step toward putting U.S. foreign policy on the side of human rights in Egypt.