Boko Haram: Now What?

Download PDF
Women hold banners during a march of Nigeria women and mothers of the kidnapped girls of Chibok, calling for their freedom (Photo Credit: Philip Ojisua/AFP/Getty Images).

Women hold banners during a march of Nigeria women and mothers of the kidnapped girls of Chibok, calling for their freedom (Photo Credit: Philip Ojisua/AFP/Getty Images).

Johanna Lee contributed to this post. 

In mid-April, Islamist armed group Boko Haram abducted 276 schoolgirls aged 15-18 from the village of Chibok in northeast Nigeria. The abductions triggered outrage, protests and a social media campaign criticizing the response of the Nigerian authorities and demanding a major effort to secure the freedom of the girls.

Yet, almost two months later, little, if any, progress has been made in freeing the kidnapped girls and the administration of President Goodluck Jonathan and his security forces have failed to communicate a plan or even convince the families of the girls that they are doing all that they can to get the girls released.

The Nigerian military is either unable or unwilling to clean up its act, committing systematic egregious human rights violations with impunity.

The last update was about two weeks ago when the Nigerian army claimed to have located the girls but went on to nix any ideas of a rescue. The army did announce that an additional 20,000 soldiers were being deployed to the northern region of the country, but no details about when and where the forces would be sent was offered.

Boko Haram continues to commit grave human rights abuses with impunity, including killing dozens of villagers living near the border with Cameroon, and killing approximately 200 people over a two-week period of attacks in the Gwoza hills. They also abducted 20 more women and three men in Borno state earlier this week.

At the international level, the spotlight will once again return to Nigeria and the issue of stopping violence against women and girls during times of armed conflict through a gathering of international leaders at a meeting in London.

The historic 2014 Global Summit to End Sexual Violence in Conflict has representatives from over 145 countries and will use the Chibok abductions as a focus case for discussions. The summit will be followed by a smaller security meeting focused on Nigeria and Boko Haram.

Schoolgirls who escaped from the Boko Haram arrive at the Government House to speak with the State Governor after protests supporting the kidnapped girls were banned in Nigeria's capital, Abuja (Photo Credit: STR/AFP/Getty Images).

Schoolgirls who escaped from the Boko Haram arrive at the Government House to speak with the State Governor after protests supporting the kidnapped girls were banned in Nigeria’s capital, Abuja (Photo Credit: STR/AFP/Getty Images).

Yet, despite these efforts, the international community continues to run into a critical problem: the Nigerian military is either unable or unwilling to clean up its act, committing systematic egregious human rights violations with impunity.

This, correctly, has caused governments like the United States to have to think hard about what kind of assistance they should provide, how they can ensure that the assistance does not contribute to the commission of human rights abuses and to demand accountability and reform from the Nigerian military. Another equally large problem is the fact that the Nigerian authorities do not appear to be ready to change what most have concluded is a failed strategy on the Boko Haram crisis.

Many people in the United States, understandably, continue to demand that the girls be rescued now, no matter it takes. There are calls for a rescue mission, in which the U.S. will simply march in and together with the Nigerian army in an “A-Team” fashion, free the girls and take down the bad guys in the process.

But such a response could result in worse situation, not just for the abducted girls, but for the general population in the region.

The debate among policy makers in the U.S. has sadly focused on incorrectly blaming U.S. laws enacted to prevent U.S. security assistance from contributing to human rights abuses, when the focus should be on the lack of political will to enact badly needed reform in Abuja.

This same analysis also forgets why legislation like the Leahy Law is critically important to countries that receive U.S. security assistance as well as to the United States.

Building the capacity of militaries that do not think twice about abusing their own citizens is not in anyone’s interest and has been proven to result in worse human rights abuses.

The debates have not focused on how the U.S. can help strengthen the rule of law and accountability and address a key driver behind the worsening economic situation in northern Nigeria that is also contributing to the Boko Haram crisis: climate change and its impact on livelihoods.

What, then, needs to be done? First, the Nigerian military must address the issue of corruption and human rights abuses inside its own house. The Nigerian military must render itself accountable for a long trail of human rights abuses going back decades.

The friends of Nigeria, including the United States, must also work with the Nigerian government to restore the robust rule of law and demonstrate that all are accountable to the law, be it alleged members of Boko Haram or members of the Nigerian political elite or army. Faith in the government, local as well as national, and a sense of inclusion will be essential among the general population in what will be a long struggle.

The government must start to actively respond to its citizens human rights concerns and answer difficult questions. To date, the government appears to be doing nearly nothing beyond firing generals who they have concluded colluded with Boko Haram.

In order to push all of these critical action items, the international community needs to keep the spotlight on Abuja and the military, on Boko Haram and on the girls of Chibok , and most importantly, listen to what the people of Nigeria are saying.

It will not be quick or easy, but it is the best way forward.

AIUSA welcomes a lively and courteous discussion that follow our Community Guidelines. Comments are not pre-screened before they post but AIUSA reserves the right to remove any comments violating our guidelines.

3 thoughts on “Boko Haram: Now What?

  1. You said a lot but offered little to solve the current problem.
    Meanwhile,the U.S. is funding and arming terrorist groups on a rampage in the middle east. Also, your organisation is silent on S.Arabia that funds violence world wide. You won't arm a legitimate Government to fight an islamist group,but illegitimate armed rebels who were voted by no-one is being armed by the U.S. to bring down governments. You say the Nigerian Government has not done anything about bokoharam in 2months what about the U.S. and U.K.? Do they not have surveillance drones in a the area? Blaming the Nigerian military's human rights abuses for the problem is like chasing a rabbit on foot.What has that got to do with finding boko haram?
    You support the stand of the U.S. government not to support Nigeria's military in finding the girls due to human right abuses while you mourn the Nigerian governments inability to find them, who is fooling who?
    Which is worse the Military human rights abuse of a LEGITIMATE, Democratically elected Government or an ILLEGITIMATE terrorist group? Solve the problem first!! Give the LEGITIMATE government the tools they need to solve the problem.
    You want to listen to a Nigerian? Well, you are listening to one.

  2. By the way,why is it that the Nigerian Military was allowed to be part of so many U.S. approved U.N. peace keeping an policing forces with such 'TERRIBLE' human rights records? Yet, they(U.S.) are not prepared to arm them to fight murderous islamist groups? How come AIUSA have never protested vehemently against the Nigerian military's involvement in peace keeping in conflict ridden places? I guess the law changes as interest's change.