One Year After Disputed Elections Many Languish in Iran's Prisons

Imprisoned Student Leader Majid Tavakkoli

The one year anniversary of the disputed June 12, 2009 presidential election in Iran has been greeted by a cornucopia of thoughtful analyses of the momentous event and its aftermath. Many commentators have focused on the more political issues—of whether the Islamic Republic will survive and in what form, and whether or not the Green Movement has lost its momentum. While these interesting debates are occurring, Amnesty International and other human rights organizations continue to fulfill their own important role of standing back from the political arena and aiming their spotlight solely on the human rights violations that continue to be perpetrated against the people of Iran.

As Amnesty International’s comprehensive new report From Protest to Prison – Iran One Year After the Election shows, large numbers of people are suffering in Iran’s prisons—those arrested in the wake of the June 12 election and those who have been languishing there before that date. These violations continue in an atmosphere of impunity for those who viciously beat or killed innocent protesters in the street such as Neda Agha-Soltan, or who tortured and sexually assaulted detainees in Kahrizak and other facilities.

The machinery of repression that has trapped so many innocent people in Iran is cloaked as the administration of justice; the system is rife with persistent and pervasive abuses from beginning to end. Those arrested are held in incommunicado detention where they face torture. They are deprived of access to their lawyers and family. They are charged with vague pseudo-crimes such as “propaganda against the system.” They are coerced into making confessions which can be used against them in court and are often aired on television. They are tried before Revolutionary Courts that fail to adhere to international standards for fair trial; the defendants and their lawyers often can’t see the charges or evidence against them and are prevented from presenting an adequate, or even any, defense. Many prisoners of conscience have been given harsh sentences. As the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran has pointed out, a large number of these harsh sentences have been handed down by only three judges who can in no way be considered independent. One judge alone, Abolghassem Salvati, has sentenced more than one hundred people charged with participating in or inciting the post-election unrest to lengthy prison sentences or, in the case of nine people, to death.

The human rights defenders, journalists, student leaders, women’s rights activists and labor activists suffering in Iran’s prisons desperately need the help of concerned citizens around the world to put pressure on the Iranian government. These include Shiva Nazar Ahari, a young journalist who is facing charges that could lead to the imposition of the death penalty; Emadeddin Baghi, a fearless human rights defender who has spent considerable time in prison due to his to, among other things, efforts to abolish the death penalty, who has been held in detention without charge since late December, and who suffers from severe health problems; Hengameh Shahidi, a journalist and adviser to presidential candidate Mehdi Karroubi who is serving a six-year prison sentence; and Majid Tavakkoli, a student leader who was arrested in December 2009 for making a speech to commemorate Students Day and who has been sentenced to an eight and a half year prison sentence. Amnesty International is urging its activists to participate in a one-year campaign to free these prisoners.

Last year’s massive crowds in the streets have vanished as Iranians have been terrorized into resorting to small acts of silent protest; the Iranian government reportedly mobilized more than two million Basij paramilitaries to Tehran to make sure there was no recurrence of  last summer’s demonstrations for June 12, 2010. It is now more important than ever to remember those who the Iranian government would love for us to forget. The Iranian authorities thrive on the silence and indifference of the international community. They have urged their prisoners such as Roxana Saberi to keep the stories of their unjust detentions from being made public, lest it hurt their cases. As Ms Saberi found out however, exactly the opposite was true. The barrage of outrage that resulted from the widespread dissemination of her story almost certainly contributed to her release, as it doubtless did to the release on bail of acclaimed film director Jafar Panahi after more than two months in detention without charge.

It is simply not true that the Iranian government does not care about what people in the rest of the world think or say about them. If that were indeed the case, the authorities would make no attempt to jam cell phone, email and Facebook to prevent those in Iran from telling other people what is happening; they would make no effort to expel foreign journalists, or prevent them from covering news of street protests; they would not spend so much on their own news agencies including English language news agencies, to spread their own viewpoint to the world; nor would they have sent such a high level delegation led by Mohammad Javad Larijani, the secretary-general of the Iranian High Council for Human Rights to Geneva to defend Iran’s human rights record at its Universal Period Review before the U.N. Human Rights Council.

The time is now to commit ourselves to always be a thorn in the side of the Iranian authorities, never letting them off the hook until they finally release our friends Shiva Nazar Ahari, Majid Tavakkoli, Hengameh Shahidi, Emadeddin Baghi and so many others.

AIUSA welcomes a lively and courteous discussion that follow our Community Guidelines. Comments are not pre-screened before they post but AIUSA reserves the right to remove any comments violating our guidelines.

16 thoughts on “One Year After Disputed Elections Many Languish in Iran's Prisons

  1. What exactly to you suggest we do to "be a thorn in the side" of the Iranian government for the year-long campaign.

  2. What exactly to you suggest we do to “be a thorn in the side” of the Iranian government for the year-long campaign.

  3. Joe–that is a very good question! If you click on the links on the individuals referenced in the blog piece you will find actions you can take on each one. If you click on the link at Neda Agha-Soltan's name you will see a link to an online action you can take calling for the authorities to investigate her killing and allow the U.N. special rapporteur on extra-judicial, summary, and arbitrary executions into Iran to investigate the dozens of killings after the June 12 election. Please also go to http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/irania… for profiles of several prisoners of conscience in Iran and actions you can take for each one. Thank you for taking the actions. We know they make a difference.

    Elise

  4. Joe–that is a very good question! If you click on the links on the individuals referenced in the blog piece you will find actions you can take on each one. If you click on the link at Neda Agha-Soltan's name you will see a link to an online action you can take calling for the authorities to investigate her killing and allow the U.N. special rapporteur on extra-judicial, summary, and arbitrary executions into Iran to investigate the dozens of killings after the June 12 election. Please also go to http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/irania… for profiles of several prisoners of conscience in Iran and actions you can take for each one. Thank you for taking the actions. We know they make a difference.

    Elise

  5. Joe–that is a very good question! If you click on the links on the individuals referenced in the blog piece you will find actions you can take on each one. If you click on the link at Neda Agha-Soltan's name you will see a link to an online action you can take calling for the authorities to investigate her killing and allow the U.N. special rapporteur on extra-judicial, summary, and arbitrary executions into Iran to investigate the dozens of killings after the June 12 election. Please also go to http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/irania… for profiles of several prisoners of conscience in Iran and actions you can take for each one. Thank you for taking the actions. We know they make a difference.

    Elise

  6. Joe–that is a very good question! If you click on the links on the individuals referenced in the blog piece you will find actions you can take on each one. If you click on the link at Neda Agha-Soltan’s name you will see a link to an online action you can take calling for the authorities to investigate her killing and allow the U.N. special rapporteur on extra-judicial, summary, and arbitrary executions into Iran to investigate the dozens of killings after the June 12 election. Please also go to http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/iranian-prisoners-conscience-detained-dissent-2010-06-08 for profiles of several prisoners of conscience in Iran and actions you can take for each one. Thank you for taking the actions. We know they make a difference.

    Elise

  7. Don't forget Sarah, Shane and Josh, global human rights colleagues who have also been languishing in Evin prison, Iran for almost a year without charge after being captured while on a hiking vacation in Iraqi Kurdistan. Please go to http://www.freethehikers.org to see how you can help bring them home.

  8. Don't forget Sarah, Shane and Josh, global human rights colleagues who have also been languishing in Evin prison, Iran for almost a year without charge after being captured while on a hiking vacation in Iraqi Kurdistan. Please go to http://www.freethehikers.org to see how you can help bring them home.

  9. Don't forget Sarah, Shane and Josh, global human rights colleagues who have also been languishing in Evin prison, Iran for almost a year without charge after being captured while on a hiking vacation in Iraqi Kurdistan. Please go to http://www.freethehikers.org to see how you can help bring them home.

  10. Don’t forget Sarah, Shane and Josh, global human rights colleagues who have also been languishing in Evin prison, Iran for almost a year without charge after being captured while on a hiking vacation in Iraqi Kurdistan. Please go to http://www.freethehikers.org to see how you can help bring them home.

  11. Dear Ms Auerbach,

    My utmost solidarity with those suffering imprisonment with attendant rape or torture in Iran's prisons.

    At the same time, i dispute your continuing description of the last elections as "disputed".

    Moussavi's hasty allegation of "disputedness" was utterly unscrupulous.

    And groundless.

    No evidence was ever shown for such charges.

    He just tried to hurry on a Ukrainian or Georgian style "color revolution" scenario with his allegations.

    The discrediting of his charges is the reason behind the withering of the socalled "Green" movement today.

    Let's go back to facts, which are the bedrock of your blogs.

  12. Dear Ms Auerbach,

    My utmost solidarity with those suffering imprisonment with attendant rape or torture in Iran’s prisons.

    At the same time, i dispute your continuing description of the last elections as “disputed”.

    Moussavi’s hasty allegation of “disputedness” was utterly unscrupulous.

    And groundless.

    No evidence was ever shown for such charges.

    He just tried to hurry on a Ukrainian or Georgian style “color revolution” scenario with his allegations.

    The discrediting of his charges is the reason behind the withering of the socalled “Green” movement today.

    Let’s go back to facts, which are the bedrock of your blogs.

  13. Mr. Savage–Amnesty International has never taken a position on the legitimacy of the June 12, 2009 election results. When we say the elections were disputed, that is just a recognition of reality: the election results were contested by many, which was the original impetus for the massive street protests. So we are just sticking to the facts when we call the elections disputed.

    Elise Auerbach

  14. Mr. Savage–Amnesty International has never taken a position on the legitimacy of the June 12, 2009 election results. When we say the elections were disputed, that is just a recognition of reality: the election results were contested by many, which was the original impetus for the massive street protests. So we are just sticking to the facts when we call the elections disputed.

    Elise Auerbach

  15. Not so, Ms Auerbach.

    You said "the disputed June 12, 2009 presidential elections".

    That's categorization.

    Classification.

    You didn't say "reportedly".

    Not even "allegedly".

    Or anything else to distinguish your description from those of similar other baseless allegations, made before the results were even out.

    BIG difference.

    MAJOR.

    Update yourself.

    Hear what Iranian observers are saying.

    Don't stick to year – old charges that went unrepeated.

    Many Iranians were misled by Moussavi's unscrupulous charges, too.

    Today people are disgusted with him.

    Reason for his waning.

    His vanishing from public.

    & the withering of the "Greens".

    Take a leaf, Ms Auerbach.

  16. Not so, Ms Auerbach.

    You said “the disputed June 12, 2009 presidential elections”.

    That’s categorization.

    Classification.

    You didn’t say “reportedly”.

    Not even “allegedly”.

    Or anything else to distinguish your description from those of similar other baseless allegations, made before the results were even out.

    BIG difference.

    MAJOR.

    Update yourself.

    Hear what Iranian observers are saying.

    Don’t stick to year – old charges that went unrepeated.

    Many Iranians were misled by Moussavi’s unscrupulous charges, too.

    Today people are disgusted with him.

    Reason for his waning.

    His vanishing from public.

    & the withering of the “Greens”.

    Take a leaf, Ms Auerbach.