6 responses

  1. Scott Campbell
    March 24, 2011

    It is just typical that the Chinese would crack down on anything resembling free speech.

  2. Scott Campbell
    March 24, 2011

    It is just typical that the Chinese would crack down on anything resembling free speech.

  3. Abnormal Internation
    March 25, 2011

    I am not sure, nor I am justifying what China does, But !

    In a democratic country, where freedom of speech, right to fight against the government etc. is allowed, in a Military Regime, Marxists or Socialists regime, it is not possible. It is the way the country is being ruled. Let's not look far, let's look at a few centuries back in so called democracies of the west when the King's ruled… More a Dictatorship ya? Was freedom of speech allowed??

    See, the world changes and moves forward and some practices change and so called "Best Practices" come in to being. But, just because one part moves forward, you can't call the others laggards. Are the western democracies expecting the other countries to move forwards with them or are they expecting these countries to follow them? If so, are these so called democracies willing to help the non-democracies to change??

    Why only help change politically? why not help develop and change economically ? I don't see the western democracies crying about the hungry people in China, but, only about those who cannot express their views in China? Why the double standards? Why not talk on behalf of them too??

  4. Abnormal International !
    March 25, 2011

    I am not sure, nor I am justifying what China does, But !

    In a democratic country, where freedom of speech, right to fight against the government etc. is allowed, in a Military Regime, Marxists or Socialists regime, it is not possible. It is the way the country is being ruled. Let’s not look far, let’s look at a few centuries back in so called democracies of the west when the King’s ruled… More a Dictatorship ya? Was freedom of speech allowed??

    See, the world changes and moves forward and some practices change and so called “Best Practices” come in to being. But, just because one part moves forward, you can’t call the others laggards. Are the western democracies expecting the other countries to move forwards with them or are they expecting these countries to follow them? If so, are these so called democracies willing to help the non-democracies to change??

    Why only help change politically? why not help develop and change economically ? I don’t see the western democracies crying about the hungry people in China, but, only about those who cannot express their views in China? Why the double standards? Why not talk on behalf of them too??

  5. catherine veillon-gu
    April 21, 2011

    Je ne suis pas certaine d'avoir tout compris, quelqu'un pourait il avoir la patience de traduire ? (je parle de la réponse ci-dessus)

  6. catherine veillon-guilloux
    April 22, 2011

    Je ne suis pas certaine d’avoir tout compris, quelqu’un pourait il avoir la patience de traduire ? (je parle de la réponse ci-dessus)

Back to top
mobile desktop