Mississippi to Execute Man Defended by Law Clerk

witness viewing room death penalty

Execution viewing room for witnesses © Scott Langley

There are many reasons our criminal justice (and capital punishment) system gets things wrong.  Police or prosecutor misconduct, mistaken witnesses, botched forensic science.  But one of the surest ways to get wrongly convicted, or get wrongly sentenced to death, is to have a bad lawyer.

Michael Brawner (scheduled for execution on June 12 in Mississippi) had a bad lawyer. In fact, prior to his trial, the legal representative doing most of the work on his case was not a lawyer at all, but a law clerk who had failed the bar exam (he passed just in time for the start of the trial). 

Now, Michael Brawner was probably not wrongly convicted.  He killed four people – his daughter, his ex-wife and her parents – an undoubtedly terrible crime.  But he may have been wrongly sentenced to death.

Before passing a sentence of death, juries are supposed to consider mitigating evidence, such as the defendant’s background or mental health, that might convince them to vote for a lesser sentence.  No such evidence was presented to Michael Brawner’s jury, and they dutifully issued a death sentence about an hour after retiring to deliberate.

Along with legal incompetence, mental health is at the center of Michael Brawner’s case.  After conversations with the aforementioned unqualified law clerk, Brawner rejected a plea bargain and pled not guilty by reason of insanity.  But at trial his defense called no experts to support his claim of insanity.  And because Michael Brawner once said he didn’t want any mitigation – explaining “I don’t feel that I deserve to live” – his lawyers washed their hands of him, and compelling information about his childhood and consequent psychological problems was never shared with the jurors who decided his fate.

When Michael Brawner was eight he saw his father rape his seven-year-old sister, a horrific crime that was committed repeatedly over the next 5 years. To keep him quiet, his father beat him regularly, often so viciously that he missed school in order to recover from the abuse. At age 14, after his father was finally sent to prison, Michael Brawner was hospitalized for two months for polysubstance dependency and PTSD.  He was later also diagnosed with bipolar disorder.

Had the jury known about this brutal upbringing and its mental health consequences, might they have voted for something other than a death sentence?

We’ll never know, of course. But while Michael Brawner’s lawyers dropped the ball, it is at least in the power of the Governor of Mississippi to call off the execution and grant him clemency.

AIUSA welcomes a lively and courteous discussion that follow our Community Guidelines. Comments are not pre-screened before they post but AIUSA reserves the right to remove any comments violating our guidelines.

7 thoughts on “Mississippi to Execute Man Defended by Law Clerk

  1. Now, Michael Brawner was "probably" not wrongly convicted. Boy is that an understatement.
    You also conveniently left out from your readers the fact that a court-appointed psychiatrist determined Brawner was neither insane nor incompentent to stand trial. On April 25 2001 he executed his planned and thought out brutal actions – and decided to include his own daughter because he did not want any witness alive to identify him. Brawner decided himself not to call his Mother, Sister or a Psychiatrist during sentencing. No one knows what they would have testified to – and how that testimony would stand up to cross-examination. The defendant in the case was asked repeatedly about presenting witnesses and mitigation during the sentencing phase – to which he declined. Those interested in knowing the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth – visit the website I have attached. http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ms-supreme-court/11261

    • Brian No-Last-Name, you're still as supportive of the death penalty and of the mob mentality as usual, demanding that Michael Brawner be killed by the death penalty in spite of the problems of hiring a bad lawyer that went totally ignored. Also, you always demand that Abdul Awkal be killed by execution in spite of his mental illness that went totally ignored while helping the families of victims who support the death penalty and ignoring the families of death row inmates! You never care about them, or innocence, or human rights at all! :x

  2. Thank you for not caving Governor Bryant… Thank you for allowing justice to be served.

  3. Maybe he really should be convicted. We were saved by an almost similar incident when the one being defended by our car accident lawyer perth was arrested too. Our family thought highly and good of him, not until investigations proved us wrong.

  4. It is really unpleasant to get a sight on this kind of pivotal moments when it's really just unfortunate to have a bad lawyer on your side considering your life is lying in the table. I bet our accident lawyer in Long Island can do a better job than a novice lawyer.