Hope and Change? U.S. makes $900 million pledge to Gaza

Yesterday, the U.S. State Department leaked an upcoming pledge of $900 million to reconstruct Gaza and support the Palestinian Authority.  No money will pass through Hamas but will be filtered through non-governmental organizations.  I applaud this assistance but question the effectiveness of aid without negotiations and opening the borders.
Daniel Levy, a senior fellow at the Century Foundation and an Israeli citizen, wonders whether money will pass into Gaza at all:

“The next step is opening the border crossings, and that requires more than just signing a check.”

The irony, of course, is that the US is supplying aid to victims of US made weapons.  The U.S. has been trading arms with Israel while donating to Palestinian reconstruction.  In fact, the Obama administration has continued Bush’s pledge of $30 billion in military assistance to Israel over the next 10 years.   There are no investigations into whether US weapons were used in the recent conflict to harm civilians.  And given that the US refuses to speak to the governing power in Gaza,   who, then, can be held accountable?  And how?
These structural obstacles to the $900 million pledge present a challenge for the Obama administration.  Levy goes on to analyze this:

“There are structural flaws – not least, that Israelis and Palestinians cannot negotiate the core issues alone and need an outside broker and that Palestinian statehood cannot be incubated under Israeli occupation. The very structure of the peace process has become a disincentive for peace itself. There now exists an opportunity to do away with the illusion, even if the danger also exists that events may take a more violent, confrontational and bloody turn.
A different approach would require the US conducting back-to-back talks with the Israeli side and with a Palestinian (or Palestinian plus Arab states) interlocutor, in which one attempts to address the key legitimate needs and concerns of each party. It will be the role of the US and international partners to produce a proposal and implementation plan.”

That’s not to say that aid is not needed:

“Two separate Palestinian surveys have put the cost of the damage at just under $2bn.” – the BBC reports.

But maybe the problem’s too big for a check—no matter how large or generous-to fix.  Nonetheless I am cautiously optimistic about this overture from the US and I hope the US follows up by pressing Israel to open up the borders so that aid can enter without hindrance.

Co-written by Zahir Janmohamed and Ally Krupar

AIUSA welcomes a lively and courteous discussion that follow our Community Guidelines. Comments are not pre-screened before they post but AIUSA reserves the right to remove any comments violating our guidelines.

10 thoughts on “Hope and Change? U.S. makes $900 million pledge to Gaza

  1. I think this is obscene considering the US sent all the weapons to Israel and led the cheer squad for bombing that caused the destruction.

    All nations need to boycott the rogue state Israel instead of pandering to their rambling paranoia.

    Israel is not a state, never has been and never will be but the Palestinian owners of the land are the ones being treated like the criminals – it's bizarre.

  2. I think this is obscene considering the US sent all the weapons to Israel and led the cheer squad for bombing that caused the destruction.

    All nations need to boycott the rogue state Israel instead of pandering to their rambling paranoia.

    Israel is not a state, never has been and never will be but the Palestinian owners of the land are the ones being treated like the criminals – it’s bizarre.

  3. Rogue state of Israel? I agree that they use far too much force at times, but they aren't the real criminals. Blame the Palestinian power brokers who broker cease-fires only to encourage youths to ignore them. Blame the people who stockpile the foreign aid only to distribute it in their own names to win the people to their cause. Blame the people who hide their weapons in schools and mosques, and then goad Israel into attacking them.

    Israel is guilty of using far too much force, and at times with less discretion than they should. Israel is INCREDIBLY guilty of building a wall that takes 80% of the water resources onto the Israeli side. But, despite your affirmations, Israel does not try to destroy the Palestinian people. Israel is a state, just as Palestine was and should be.

    Under British rule, Jews were living there. During and after World War II, more Jews came. When the British left, they had to choose between trying to live under a Palestinian government that did not recognize their rights, or to forge a new government. You must remember, during the UN negotiations Israel agreed to a multi-state solution that saw Palestine keep much of the populated areas. But the Palestinian leaders at the time wouldn't have it, and wanted the Jews gone entirely. So, rather than be killed, the Jews living there fought and won the land. Does that sound paranoid to you?

  4. Rogue state of Israel? I agree that they use far too much force at times, but they aren’t the real criminals. Blame the Palestinian power brokers who broker cease-fires only to encourage youths to ignore them. Blame the people who stockpile the foreign aid only to distribute it in their own names to win the people to their cause. Blame the people who hide their weapons in schools and mosques, and then goad Israel into attacking them.

    Israel is guilty of using far too much force, and at times with less discretion than they should. Israel is INCREDIBLY guilty of building a wall that takes 80% of the water resources onto the Israeli side. But, despite your affirmations, Israel does not try to destroy the Palestinian people. Israel is a state, just as Palestine was and should be.

    Under British rule, Jews were living there. During and after World War II, more Jews came. When the British left, they had to choose between trying to live under a Palestinian government that did not recognize their rights, or to forge a new government. You must remember, during the UN negotiations Israel agreed to a multi-state solution that saw Palestine keep much of the populated areas. But the Palestinian leaders at the time wouldn’t have it, and wanted the Jews gone entirely. So, rather than be killed, the Jews living there fought and won the land. Does that sound paranoid to you?

  5. I'm just getting started with blogging and have learned some nice techniques from your site. Thanks!

  6. I’m just getting started with blogging and have learned some nice techniques from your site. Thanks!

  7. Great article, thank you. It is so easy to see flashes of information from CNN and take them for some kind of truth. Your analysis and thoughtful critique has made it clear the hurdles that check will have to clear, before it is money in the bank.

    Thanks, keep up the good work.
    Janet

  8. Great article, thank you. It is so easy to see flashes of information from CNN and take them for some kind of truth. Your analysis and thoughtful critique has made it clear the hurdles that check will have to clear, before it is money in the bank.

    Thanks, keep up the good work.
    Janet