Shell Accused Over Misleading Figures on Nigeria Oil Spills

Shell has no compensation liability when spills are declared 'sabotage' © Kadir van Lohuizen/NOOR

Amnesty International and Friends of the Earth International today filed an official complaint against oil giant Shell for breaches of basic standards for responsible business set out by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Amnesty and Friends of the Earth believe that Shell breached OECD guidelines by using discredited and misleading information, in order to blame the majority of oil pollution in the Niger Delta region on sabotage and criminal activity.

In the mid 1990s Shell accepted that much of the oil pollution in the Niger Delta was due to the company’s own failures.  However, Shell now blames sabotage by communities and criminals for most of the problem, citing misleading figures that purport to show as much as 98% of oil spills being caused by sabotage.

While sabotage is a problem in the Niger Delta, Amnesty International and Friends of the Earth have repeatedly challenged Shell’s use of such figures, which have been strongly criticized by environmental groups and communities.  Under Nigerian law, when spills are classified as being the result of sabotage, Shell has no liability with respect to compensation for damage done to people or their livelihoods.

Shell’s figures are totally lacking in credibility.  Widespread oil pollution is a key problem caused by oil industry in the Niger Delta, but the oil spill investigation system is totally lacking in independence.

Both Friends of the Earth and Amnesty International found that in many cases oil companies have significant influence on determining the official cause of a spill.

Nnimmo Bassey, Director of Friends of the Earth Nigeria and chair of Friends of the Earth International said:

“We monitor spills regularly and our observations often contradict information produced by Shell. Several studies have placed the bulk of the blame for oil spills in the Niger Delta on the doorsteps of the oil companies; particularly Shell. It should take its responsibility and clean up the mess it made in our country.”

Despite repeated requests, Shell has so far failed to make clear the basis for the figures they have published and how the data were gathered. Furthermore, Amnesty International and Friends of the Earth have documented cases where Shell claimed the cause of a spill was sabotage, but the claim was subsequently questioned by other investigations or the courts.

In 2009 Shell was compelled to correct misleading information regarding the cause of oil spills. After repeatedly claiming that 85% of all oil spills in 2008 were caused by sabotage, it announced that the figure was closer to 50%. Neither the claims of 85% or 50% have been properly explained. Moreover, Shell made almost no attempt to correct the erroneous impression created by its widespread use of the 85% figure.

In over half a century of Shell’s operations in the Niger Delta thousands of oil spills have left an appalling legacy of environmental harm.  Water that people use for fishing and drinking is polluted with oil, while farm land and crops have been destroyed.

The misuse of data on the cause of oil spills, and the failure of Shell and the government to ensure fair, credible investigations perpetuates human rights abuses, by denying justice and compensation to communities.

Tomorrow Shell will be under scrutiny for its environmental and human rights impacts during a hearing in the Dutch Parliament on the company’s activities in Nigeria.

AIUSA welcomes a lively and courteous discussion that follow our Community Guidelines. Comments are not pre-screened before they post but AIUSA reserves the right to remove any comments violating our guidelines.

10 thoughts on “Shell Accused Over Misleading Figures on Nigeria Oil Spills

  1. Bit perplexed why this is primarily an Amnesty story and not a Greenpeace one? Worthy cause but not sure if Amnesty should be muddling it's mission with mission creep

  2. To respond to the comment above from Trojan Horus, I don't see Amnesty's involvement here as a case of "mission creep" at all. Anyone who is familiar with the situation in the Niger Delta know that gross human rights violations are occurring on a daily basis. The goal of Amnesty International is to stop the abuse of human rights, so it would make sense that the organization is working to bring justice and shine a light on the situation.

    Many people assume that the Delta is a purely environmental disaster, but that is not the case. The people who are unfortunate enough to live there, are affected in myriad ways. They suffer from ill health, lack of education and work opportunities, discrimination based on political and ethnic orientation, and they suffer from psychologically from living in such appalling conditions.

    Read Ed Kashi's photo essays "Curse of the Black Gold: 50 Years of Oil in the Niger Delta" to educate yourself on the reasons why Amnesty is involved with this case. http://www.curseoftheblackgoldbook.com/#a=0&a

  3. To respond to the comment above from Trojan Horus, I don't see Amnesty's involvement here as a case of "mission creep" at all. Anyone who is familiar with the situation in the Niger Delta know that gross human rights violations are occurring on a daily basis. The goal of Amnesty International is to stop the abuse of human rights, so it would make sense that the organization is working to bring justice and shine a light on the situation.

    Many people assume that the Delta is a purely environmental disaster, but that is not the case. The people who are unfortunate enough to live there, are affected in myriad ways. They suffer from ill health, lack of education and work opportunities, discrimination based on political and ethnic orientation, and they suffer from psychologically from living in such appalling conditions.

    Read Ed Kashi's photo essays "Curse of the Black Gold: 50 Years of Oil in the Niger Delta" to educate yourself on the reasons why Amnesty is involved with this case. http://www.curseoftheblackgoldbook.com/#a=0&a

  4. To respond to the comment above from Trojan Horus, I don't see Amnesty's involvement here as a case of "mission creep" at all. Anyone who is familiar with the situation in the Niger Delta know that gross human rights violations are occurring on a daily basis. The goal of Amnesty International is to stop the abuse of human rights, so it would make sense that the organization is working to bring justice and shine a light on the situation.

    Many people assume that the Delta is a purely environmental disaster, but that is not the case. The people who are unfortunate enough to live there, are affected in myriad ways. They suffer from ill health, lack of education and work opportunities, discrimination based on political and ethnic orientation, and they suffer from psychologically from living in such appalling conditions.

    Read Ed Kashi's photo essays "Curse of the Black Gold: 50 Years of Oil in the Niger Delta" to educate yourself on the reasons why Amnesty is involved with this case. http://www.curseoftheblackgoldbook.com/#a=0&a

  5. Bit perplexed why this is primarily an Amnesty story and not a Greenpeace one? Worthy cause but not sure if Amnesty should be muddling it’s mission with mission creep

  6. To respond to the comment above from Trojan Horus, I don’t see Amnesty’s involvement here as a case of “mission creep” at all. Anyone who is familiar with the situation in the Niger Delta know that gross human rights violations are occurring on a daily basis. The goal of Amnesty International is to stop the abuse of human rights, so it would make sense that the organization is working to bring justice and shine a light on the situation.

    Many people assume that the Delta is a purely environmental disaster, but that is not the case. The people who are unfortunate enough to live there, are affected in myriad ways. They suffer from ill health, lack of education and work opportunities, discrimination based on political and ethnic orientation, and they suffer from psychologically from living in such appalling conditions.

    Read Ed Kashi’s photo essays “Curse of the Black Gold: 50 Years of Oil in the Niger Delta” to educate yourself on the reasons why Amnesty is involved with this case. http://www.curseoftheblackgoldbook.com/#a=0&at=0&mi=1&pt=0&pi=8&s=0&p=-1

  7. @Trojan Horus – Oil wrecking the environment in the Niger Delta has serious human rights consequences, including violations of the right to food, the rights to work and to an adequate standard of living, and the right to health, including a healthy environment. When communities have their rights violated, they deserve justice — and that's a human rights issue too. So oil pollution in the Niger Delta has human rights as well as environmental consequences, and Amnesty is glad to be working with Friends of the Earth to hold Shell accountable. For more info see: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AFR44/017

  8. @Trojan Horus – Oil wrecking the environment in the Niger Delta has serious human rights consequences, including violations of the right to food, the rights to work and to an adequate standard of living, and the right to health, including a healthy environment. When communities have their rights violated, they deserve justice — and that's a human rights issue too. So oil pollution in the Niger Delta has human rights as well as environmental consequences, and Amnesty is glad to be working with Friends of the Earth to hold Shell accountable. For more info see: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AFR44/017

  9. @Trojan Horus – Oil wrecking the environment in the Niger Delta has serious human rights consequences, including violations of the right to food, the rights to work and to an adequate standard of living, and the right to health, including a healthy environment. When communities have their rights violated, they deserve justice — and that's a human rights issue too. So oil pollution in the Niger Delta has human rights as well as environmental consequences, and Amnesty is glad to be working with Friends of the Earth to hold Shell accountable. For more info see: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AFR44/017

  10. @Trojan Horus – Oil wrecking the environment in the Niger Delta has serious human rights consequences, including violations of the right to food, the rights to work and to an adequate standard of living, and the right to health, including a healthy environment. When communities have their rights violated, they deserve justice — and that’s a human rights issue too. So oil pollution in the Niger Delta has human rights as well as environmental consequences, and Amnesty is glad to be working with Friends of the Earth to hold Shell accountable. For more info see: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AFR44/017/2009/en/e2415061-da5c-44f8-a73c-a7a4766ee21d/afr440172009en.pdf