The course of justice in Sri Lanka

The Sri Lankan Supreme Court yesterday acquitted five soldiers for the murder of 10 Muslim youths in Udathalawinna on December 5, 2001, during a general election.  The five had been security guards of Anuruddha Ratwatte, the then deputy minister of defence.  Ratwatte and his two sons had earlier been charged for the murders as well but were acquitted in 2006.  Ten young men are dead and no one, to my knowledge, has been convicted for their murder.  Is this how Sri Lanka punishes the guilty?

I couldn’t help thinking of this case when I heard that a verdict is expected on August 31 in the trial of J.S. Tissainayagam, a Sri Lankan journalist.  Tissainayagam is being tried for allegedly violating the country’s emergency regulations and Prevention of Terrorism Act.  The only evidence against him are two articles he wrote in 2006 in a monthly magazine criticizing the government’s conduct of the war against the Tamil Tigers and a confession that his lawyer says was obtained under duress.  Amnesty International has adopted him as a prisoner of conscience and calls for his immediate, unconditional release and for all charges against him to be dropped.  Will we see an acquittal for him on August 31?  Or do acquittals only apply for the powerful and those connected to them?

AIUSA welcomes a lively and courteous discussion that follow our Community Guidelines. Comments are not pre-screened before they post but AIUSA reserves the right to remove any comments violating our guidelines.

10 thoughts on “The course of justice in Sri Lanka

  1. Same way you can call al-qaeda terrorists are also prisoners of conscience, just because they fight for a cause. So there is no end.

  2. Same way you can call al-qaeda terrorists are also prisoners of conscience, just because they fight for a cause. So there is no end.

  3. Ecxellent comparison & commentary, Jim !!

    The Greeds pillory the lonely & the courageous, & craft "just-us"in their lawless courts .

  4. Ecxellent comparison & commentary, Jim !!

    The Greeds pillory the lonely & the courageous, & craft “just-us”in their lawless courts .

  5. "Or do acquittals only apply for the powerful and those connected to them?"

    Yes, it is sad but that is true all too often.

    Listen to our new song "Lord of War"

    "Close your eyes Lord of War you do not need to see
    The sounds of screaming children will lead you to the hearts that bleed"
    http://www.myspace.com/protight

  6. "Or do acquittals only apply for the powerful and those connected to them?"

    Yes, it is sad but that is true all too often.

    Listen to our new song "Lord of War"

    "Close your eyes Lord of War you do not need to see
    The sounds of screaming children will lead you to the hearts that bleed"
    http://www.myspace.com/protight

  7. "Or do acquittals only apply for the powerful and those connected to them?"

    Yes, it is sad but that is true all too often.

    Listen to our new song "Lord of War"

    "Close your eyes Lord of War you do not need to see
    The sounds of screaming children will lead you to the hearts that bleed"
    http://www.myspace.com/protight

  8. “Or do acquittals only apply for the powerful and those connected to them?”

    Yes, it is sad but that is true all too often.

    Listen to our new song “Lord of War”

    “Close your eyes Lord of War you do not need to see
    The sounds of screaming children will lead you to the hearts that bleed”

    http://www.myspace.com/protight

  9. In response to Dharmasiri Weerasinghe, AI defines a "prisoner of conscience" as someone imprisoned solely for the peaceful expression of his/her beliefs or because of his/her race, gender or other personal characteristics. Members of Al Qaeda who have used or advocated violence would not qualify.

  10. In response to Dharmasiri Weerasinghe, AI defines a “prisoner of conscience” as someone imprisoned solely for the peaceful expression of his/her beliefs or because of his/her race, gender or other personal characteristics. Members of Al Qaeda who have used or advocated violence would not qualify.